Improving the Consent Process With an Informed Consent Video Prior to Outpatient Colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Informed consent should allow patients the appropriate time and conditions to make decisions about their care. However, consent is often obtained immediately prior to a colonoscopy. We conducted a quality improvement study to assess how a preprocedure consent video 2 days prior to an outpatient colonoscopy impacts patient satisfaction. METHODS: Patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy at a large academic medical center opted in to a text messaging platform for procedural information. Our intervention was an informed consent video 2 days before the colonoscopy. Our primary outcome was a composite patient satisfaction score. Pre and postintervention scores were compared using ordinal or multinomial logistic models to calculate odds ratios (OR) or relative risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for age and sex. RESULTS: 1109 and 1452 patients completed ≥1 survey question in the pre and postintervention phases, respectively. Overall patient satisfaction did not differ between groups [OR for a 1-point increment in satisfaction score between post- vs pre-intervention groups = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.90-1.22; P = .51]. Compared to preintervention, postintervention respondents were more likely to report higher satisfaction with time available to talk with their physician (OR of a 1-point increase in individual question response = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.09-1.54; P = .004). Compared to preintervention, more physicians in the postintervention phase rated satisfaction with consent process efficiency as "very satisfied" or "satisfied" (P < .001). CONCLUSION: An informed consent video prior to colonoscopy resulted in similar overall patient satisfaction. However, post-intervention, patients were more likely to report sufficient time to talk with their physician, and physicians reported higher satisfaction with consent efficiency.

A Multicenter Study of Left Ventricular Assist Device-Related Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

INTRODUCTION: Continuous left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) offer hemodynamic support in advanced and decompensated heart failure but are often complicated by gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in medically fragile patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 475 consecutive patients who underwent LVAD implantation at the Massachusetts General Hospital and Tufts Medical Center from 2008 to 2019 and identified 128 patients with clinically significant GIB. Clinical characteristics of each bleeding event, including procedures and interventions, were recorded. We examined LVAD patients with overt and occult presentations to determine diagnostic endoscopic yield and analyzed predictors of recurrent GIB. RESULTS: We identified 128 unique patients with LVAD implantation complicated by GIB. No significant difference was observed based on study center, underlying cardiomyopathy, race/ethnicity, serum indices, and medications used. Overt bleeders presented more commonly during LVAD implantation admission ( P = 0.001) than occult bleeders. Occult bleed presentations had only 1 lower and no middle GI bleed source identified, despite similar workups to overt bleeds. Destination therapy (e.g., among nontransplant candidates) LVAD implantation (odds ratio 2.38, 95% confidence interval 1.05-5.58) and a history of GIB (odds ratio 3.85, 95% confidence interval 1.29-12.7) were independently associated with an increased risk of recurrent GIB-related hospitalization. DISCUSSION: Our findings confirm a high rate of GIB, especially in destination LVAD patients, and show a low diagnostic yield for colonoscopy and middle GI bleed assessments in LVAD patients with occult bleeds. Overt bleeding was more common and associated with vascular malformations. Although endoscopic interventions stopped active hemorrhage, GIB often recurred.

Using A Customized SMS Program to Promote Colonoscopy Adherence and Support Bowel Cleanliness for Spanish-speaking Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Low colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates among Hispanic and Latino patients result in advanced disease at the time of diagnosis and decreased survival chances. METHODS: We performed a prospective study at an academic endoscopy center in Boston, Massachusetts from May 1, 2019 to January 31, 2020. We identified 887 Spanishspeaking patients as controls and enrolled 412 (59%) Spanish-speaking patients in a short message service (SMS) program for pre-procedure instructions. RESULTS: Intervention and control group participants were similar in age, sex, and indications. Patients receiving SMS messages were less likely to no-show or cancel last minute (OR=1.66, 95%CI=0.44-0.83, p=.002) and had more adequate bowel preparations compared with the control arm (OR=1.55, 95%CI=0.45-0.92, p=.01). Overall, 93% (117/126) of patients stated they would "highly recommend" the program to others. CONCLUSIONS: Our automated SMS reminders for colonoscopy preparation increased appointment adherence, bowel preparation quality, and showed good patient satisfaction among Spanish speakers.

Gender Differences in Colonoscopy: Implications for Clinical Practice and Female Gastroenterologists.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Performing colonoscopy can be technically challenging in female patients. Female patients may prefer having a female endoscopist. This preference, coupled with the fact that there are fewer female endoscopists, may result in gender differences in colonoscopy practice. We hypothesized that the duration of female colonoscopy is longer and that female endoscopists perform a higher proportion of female colonoscopy than male colleagues. We explored the potential revenue implications of gender differences in screening colonoscopy. METHODS: We analyzed procedure time and gender differences in 16,573 screening colonoscopies performed by 27 male and 7 female endoscopists over a three-year period in one large academic practice. We modeled the potential revenue impacts of differences in procedure duration, proportion of female colonoscopy and the frequency of detected adenomas. RESULTS: We found that screening colonoscopy takes 8.8% more time to complete in female patients compared to male patients for all endoscopists (p < 0.001), and that female endoscopists perform an average of 71.2% female exams compared to male endoscopists, who perform an average of 50.8% female exams (p < 0.001). Female patients had a lower detection adenoma rate (ADR), reducing the frequency of polypectomy and reimbursement in an RVU model. The observed gender differences could account for an estimated 9.6% revenue loss per 8-h session for a female gastroenterologist performing screening colonoscopy compared to a male counterpart. CONCLUSION: Longer colonoscopy duration in females, increased proportion of female colonoscopies for female endoscopists and lower ADR in females may contribute to the gender gap in physician pay in gastroenterology.

Rectal Evacuation Disorders are Associated With Poor Bowel Preparation in Patients With Chronic Constipation: Results From Two Centers.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated factors that can predict the adequacy of bowel preparation in patients with chronic constipation undergoing colonoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients with chronic constipation who underwent anorectal manometry and at least 1 colonoscopy at 2 tertiary referral centers from 2003 to 2019. We also identified a subgroup of patients who underwent colonic transit testing through radiopaque marker testing. We determined demographic, medical, and constipation-related factors associated with poor bowel preparation and their effect on standardized quality metrics using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: We identified 274 patients with chronic constipation who underwent anorectal manometry testing. Both outlet dysfunction (prolonged balloon expulsion) and slow-transit constipation were associated with suboptimal bowel preparation. Outlet dysfunction was also associated with decreased cecal intubation rates, adenoma detection rates, and sessile serrated polyp detection rates. In multivariable analyses controlling for demographics and known factors associated with poor bowel preparation, outlet dysfunction was associated with an almost 3-fold odds of suboptimal bowel preparation [odds ratio (OR): 2.9; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-5.1] and a 3-fold reduction in cecal intubation rates (OR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.8). Among those with radiopaque marker colonic transit testing available, slow-transit constipation was associated with a >2-fold odds of suboptimal bowel preparation (OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.1-4.4). CONCLUSIONS: Among a cohort of patients with chronic constipation undergoing colonoscopy, outlet dysfunction was associated with suboptimal bowel preparation and other quality metrics. Constipated patients with a rectal evacuation disorder may represent a subgroup of patients that could benefit from individualized strategies for better bowel preparation.

A Digital Preprocedure Instruction Program for Outpatient Colonoscopy.

Introduction:Many patients struggle with colonoscopy preparation, which is complex and can be an uncomfortable as well as a time-consuming process. The confusion and anxiety from the preprocedure process may lead patients to delay their colonoscopy or skip it altogether. Digital health technology that focuses on patient engagement can play an important role in promoting colorectal cancer screening.Methods:A digital preprocedure instruction program was implemented for outpatient colonoscopy by sending critical reminders and instructions to patients through a series of short message service messages and/or emails. Eligible patients included English speakers on GoLYTELY®/NuLYTELY® or MiraLAX® preparation regimens with a valid cellphone or email address in the electronic health record. We examined the impact of digital instructions on bowel preparation quality, no-show and same-day cancellations over a 3-month period between an intervention group of 756 patients and a control group of 2,103 patients. Patients who enrolled in the digital instructions also received a patient satisfaction survey.Results:Our controlled study demonstrated the effectiveness of digital instructions to reduce no-show and same-day cancellation rates for outpatient colonoscopy from 10.40% to 6.08% (p < 0.001). Bowel preparation quality was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.23). However, 90% of patients who enrolled in the program rated their satisfaction with the digital reminders very highly.Discussion:A digital preprocedure instruction program can have a positive impact on operational efficiency, quality of care, and patient satisfaction. This study shows how digital health tools can effectively engage patients scheduled for a colonoscopy, increase appointment adherence, and, therefore, lead to better cancer screening.